Quick verdict
Decodo is useful for buyers who want a broad provider with residential, static ISP, mobile, datacenter and scraping-related proxy options. NetNut remains useful only as historical comparison context while its official domain is unavailable as an active buying destination.
Decodo remains an active provider to verify before buying. NetNut is not treated as an active buying option; use its status page for the current evidence and active alternatives.
Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | Decodo | NetNut |
|---|---|---|
| Primary fit | Multi-type proxy comparison, residential workflows and Smartproxy rebrand research | Historical residential and ISP product context; current-status reference only |
| Proxy types to verify | Residential, static ISP, mobile, datacenter and scraping-related options | Residential, ISP, datacenter and mobile options |
| Best for | Users who want one provider shortlist across several proxy types | Researchers comparing historical product positioning; not current buyers |
| Check before buying | Plan limits, rotation control, targeting, current pricing and allowed use cases | Current service availability; historical pricing must not be used as a live offer |
When Decodo may fit better
Choose Decodo for the shortlist when the buyer wants to compare several proxy types under one brand and also needs a review that explains the Smartproxy-to-Decodo rebrand context.
Why NetNut remains in the comparison
NetNut remains documented for historical product and market context. It should not enter an active buying shortlist while the official domain is unavailable; compare current alternatives from the status page instead.
